IN SUMMARY
Most life cycle assessments of batteries assume a single, static impact value for each component material. That hides the reality that the same battery, built to the same chemistry, can carry a very different carbon footprint depending on where and how its raw materials are produced. In this foundational study, Minviro modelled an NMC-811 battery, the most common chemistry in Western EVs, across low, baseline and high-impact supply chain scenarios to show just how much that variability matters at the level of a finished battery pack.
The same battery, nearly double the footprint. An NMC-811 pack ranges from 70 kg CO₂e per kWh with low-impact materials to 138 kg CO₂e with high-impact routes, against an 82 kg CO₂e baseline.
Raw materials, not the factory, drive the difference. As manufacturing electricity decarbonises over time, the impact of producing raw materials stays relatively steady, becoming the dominant and harder-to-cut share of a battery’s footprint.
Nickel and graphite are the swing factors. Nickel sulfate dominates the cathode, while graphite’s contribution rises around ninefold between low and high scenarios to make up roughly a quarter of impacts, confirming it as the hidden impactor.




