XYCLE INCLUDED IN VERDANTIX SMART INNOVATORS 2025

a close up of a bed with white sheets and pillows
A delicate white peony flower against an orange background
A delicate white peony flower against an orange background
a close up of a bed with white sheets and pillows
A delicate white peony flower against an orange background

Whitepaper

Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Sustainable Alternative to Lithium-Ion?

Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Sustainable Alternative to Lithium-Ion?

Sodium is far more abundant and cheaper than lithium, which has led many to assume sodium-ion batteries are automatically the greener choice. Minviro’s life cycle assessment of five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion shows the picture is more nuanced.

Sodium is far more abundant and cheaper than lithium, which has led many to assume sodium-ion batteries are automatically the greener choice. Minviro’s life cycle assessment of five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion shows the picture is more nuanced.

Sodium is far more abundant and cheaper than lithium, which has led many to assume sodium-ion batteries are automatically the greener choice. Minviro’s life cycle assessment of five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion shows the picture is more nuanced.

Robert Pell

Robert Pell

Jordan Lindsay

Jordan Lindsay

IN SUMMARY

Is sodium abundance enough to make sodium-ion batteries sustainable?

Is sodium abundance enough to make sodium-ion batteries sustainable?

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are attracting attention as a possible answer to lithium scarcity and price volatility. Sodium makes up 23,600 ppm of the earth’s crust against just 20 ppm for lithium, and sodium hydroxide costs a fraction of lithium hydroxide. But abundance and low cost do not automatically translate into a lower environmental footprint. Minviro assessed five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion NMC and LFP using life cycle assessment, looking beyond climate change to resource use and acidification, to test whether the “sustainable by default” assumption holds.

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are attracting attention as a possible answer to lithium scarcity and price volatility. Sodium makes up 23,600 ppm of the earth’s crust against just 20 ppm for lithium, and sodium hydroxide costs a fraction of lithium hydroxide. But abundance and low cost do not automatically translate into a lower environmental footprint. Minviro assessed five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion NMC and LFP using life cycle assessment, looking beyond climate change to resource use and acidification, to test whether the “sustainable by default” assumption holds.

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are attracting attention as a possible answer to lithium scarcity and price volatility. Sodium makes up 23,600 ppm of the earth’s crust against just 20 ppm for lithium, and sodium hydroxide costs a fraction of lithium hydroxide. But abundance and low cost do not automatically translate into a lower environmental footprint. Minviro assessed five sodium-ion chemistries against lithium-ion NMC and LFP using life cycle assessment, looking beyond climate change to resource use and acidification, to test whether the “sustainable by default” assumption holds.

  • Abundance does not equal sustainability. Sodium-ion batteries do not consistently outperform lithium-ion on climate change. Their footprint depends heavily on the specific cathode chemistry, with cobalt-containing and Prussian blue variants performing worst.

  • Abundance does not equal sustainability. Sodium-ion batteries do not consistently outperform lithium-ion on climate change. Their footprint depends heavily on the specific cathode chemistry, with cobalt-containing and Prussian blue variants performing worst.

  • Abundance does not equal sustainability. Sodium-ion batteries do not consistently outperform lithium-ion on climate change. Their footprint depends heavily on the specific cathode chemistry, with cobalt-containing and Prussian blue variants performing worst.

  • Chemistry is everything. Cobalt-free layered oxide sodium-ion cells perform comparably to LFP, while cobalt and polyanionic chemistries exceed both LFP and NMC. The electrolyte (NaPF6) and cathode are the dominant contributors.

  • Chemistry is everything. Cobalt-free layered oxide sodium-ion cells perform comparably to LFP, while cobalt and polyanionic chemistries exceed both LFP and NMC. The electrolyte (NaPF6) and cathode are the dominant contributors.

  • Chemistry is everything. Cobalt-free layered oxide sodium-ion cells perform comparably to LFP, while cobalt and polyanionic chemistries exceed both LFP and NMC. The electrolyte (NaPF6) and cathode are the dominant contributors.

  • Cycle life changes the comparison. Measured over a usable lifetime rather than a single kWh, sodium-ion and LFP cells, which can cycle 2,000 times or more, tend to carry lower impacts than NMC, which cycles fewer times.

  • Cycle life changes the comparison. Measured over a usable lifetime rather than a single kWh, sodium-ion and LFP cells, which can cycle 2,000 times or more, tend to carry lower impacts than NMC, which cycles fewer times.

  • Cycle life changes the comparison. Measured over a usable lifetime rather than a single kWh, sodium-ion and LFP cells, which can cycle 2,000 times or more, tend to carry lower impacts than NMC, which cycles fewer times.

Why sodium-ion is gaining attention

Sodium-ion and lithium-ion cells share the same basic structure, but SIBs use a sodium-based cathode in place of a lithium one. The appeal is straightforward: sodium is one of the most abundant elements in the earth’s crust, and sodium precursors are far cheaper than their lithium equivalents, with sodium hydroxide around 900 USD per tonne against roughly 75,000 USD per tonne for lithium hydroxide in early 2023. Companies including CATL, BYD, HiNa, Faradion and Natron Energy are developing the technology, initially for stationary storage and increasingly for smaller electric vehicles. Importantly, incoming battery regulations are agnostic to chemistry, so sodium-ion will face the same carbon footprint scrutiny as lithium-ion, which makes understanding its true impact essential rather than optional.

Sodium-ion and lithium-ion cells share the same basic structure, but SIBs use a sodium-based cathode in place of a lithium one. The appeal is straightforward: sodium is one of the most abundant elements in the earth’s crust, and sodium precursors are far cheaper than their lithium equivalents, with sodium hydroxide around 900 USD per tonne against roughly 75,000 USD per tonne for lithium hydroxide in early 2023. Companies including CATL, BYD, HiNa, Faradion and Natron Energy are developing the technology, initially for stationary storage and increasingly for smaller electric vehicles. Importantly, incoming battery regulations are agnostic to chemistry, so sodium-ion will face the same carbon footprint scrutiny as lithium-ion, which makes understanding its true impact essential rather than optional.

How the study was built

Minviro used a cradle-to-gate LCA, covering raw material extraction through to cell manufacturing, with a functional unit of one kilowatt-hour of contained cell storage capacity. Five sodium-ion cathode chemistries with hard carbon anodes were assessed: three layered transition metal oxides (two cobalt-free, one with cobalt), one Prussian blue analogue, and one polyanionic compound. These were compared against the two most commercialised lithium-ion chemistries, NMC-622 and LFP. Background data came from Minviro’s internal raw material database alongside Ecoinvent 3.9, using the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Because public data on sodium-ion at commercial scale is limited, the study acknowledges lower confidence in the sodium-ion background data than the lithium-ion equivalents.

Minviro used a cradle-to-gate LCA, covering raw material extraction through to cell manufacturing, with a functional unit of one kilowatt-hour of contained cell storage capacity. Five sodium-ion cathode chemistries with hard carbon anodes were assessed: three layered transition metal oxides (two cobalt-free, one with cobalt), one Prussian blue analogue, and one polyanionic compound. These were compared against the two most commercialised lithium-ion chemistries, NMC-622 and LFP. Background data came from Minviro’s internal raw material database alongside Ecoinvent 3.9, using the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Because public data on sodium-ion at commercial scale is limited, the study acknowledges lower confidence in the sodium-ion background data than the lithium-ion equivalents.

What the results show

On climate change at the cell level, sodium-ion chemistries span a wide range and do not consistently beat lithium-ion. Cobalt-free layered oxide cells perform comparably to LFP, where the NaPF6 electrolyte is the largest contributor. Cobalt-containing and polyanionic sodium-ion cells exceed both LFP and NMC, driven mainly by the cathode. Prussian blue analogues carry the highest climate change impact of the chemistries studied. The picture improves for sodium-ion on resource use, where every chemistry except the cobalt-containing one shows a clear benefit over lithium-ion, since copper, cobalt and nickel extraction drive that category. Sodium-ion also tends to have lower acidification impact, again except where nickel, manganese and cobalt are present. The story changes further over cycle life: because LFP and sodium-ion can cycle 2,000 times or more against NMC’s lower count, their lifetime impacts can fall below NMC when measured across a usable lifetime.

On climate change at the cell level, sodium-ion chemistries span a wide range and do not consistently beat lithium-ion. Cobalt-free layered oxide cells perform comparably to LFP, where the NaPF6 electrolyte is the largest contributor. Cobalt-containing and polyanionic sodium-ion cells exceed both LFP and NMC, driven mainly by the cathode. Prussian blue analogues carry the highest climate change impact of the chemistries studied. The picture improves for sodium-ion on resource use, where every chemistry except the cobalt-containing one shows a clear benefit over lithium-ion, since copper, cobalt and nickel extraction drive that category. Sodium-ion also tends to have lower acidification impact, again except where nickel, manganese and cobalt are present. The story changes further over cycle life: because LFP and sodium-ion can cycle 2,000 times or more against NMC’s lower count, their lifetime impacts can fall below NMC when measured across a usable lifetime.

What it means for battery developers

The headline conclusion is that treating sodium-ion as inherently sustainable because sodium is abundant is a flawed assumption. Sustainability depends on cathode chemistry, the source of the hard carbon precursor, cycle life and target cell capacity, all of which vary widely. The cathode active material is consistently the biggest lever, and cobalt-bearing chemistries are the most sensitive to how it is sourced. For developers, this means LCA needs to be applied early, while chemistries and supply chains are still being chosen, so environmental hotspots can be designed out rather than discovered later. Pairing LCA with life cycle costing gives the fuller picture of where sodium-ion genuinely competes, particularly in grid storage where its cost and cycle life play to its strengths.

The headline conclusion is that treating sodium-ion as inherently sustainable because sodium is abundant is a flawed assumption. Sustainability depends on cathode chemistry, the source of the hard carbon precursor, cycle life and target cell capacity, all of which vary widely. The cathode active material is consistently the biggest lever, and cobalt-bearing chemistries are the most sensitive to how it is sourced. For developers, this means LCA needs to be applied early, while chemistries and supply chains are still being chosen, so environmental hotspots can be designed out rather than discovered later. Pairing LCA with life cycle costing gives the fuller picture of where sodium-ion genuinely competes, particularly in grid storage where its cost and cycle life play to its strengths.

FAQ

Curious to learn more?

Let us support you on the journey.

Let us support you on the journey.

Reach out anytime. We’re happy to answer any questions before you commit to working together.

Strategic Accounts Manager at Minviro

What can Minviro help us understand?

We help teams measure environmental impacts across products, processes and supply chains, then turn the findings into practical decisions.

What do you need to get started?

A short conversation about your product, data and goals is enough to start. We will recommend a clear next step based on where you are today.

How do we speak with an expert?

Get in touch with our team to discuss your project, timeline and the level of support you need.

What can Minviro help us understand?

We help teams measure environmental impacts across products, processes and supply chains, then turn the findings into practical decisions.

What do you need to get started?

A short conversation about your product, data and goals is enough to start. We will recommend a clear next step based on where you are today.

How do we speak with an expert?

Get in touch with our team to discuss your project, timeline and the level of support you need.

authors

The team behind your insights

Robert Pell

Robert Pell

Founder & CEO

Robert Pell is the Founder and CEO of Minviro. His doctoral research at the University of Exeter's Camborne School of Mines focused on responsible sourcing of rare earth elements, pioneering novel Life Cycle Assessment approaches and developing methodology for integrating LCA into mine planning. A published scientist and experienced speaker, Robert holds roles as Chair of the Rare Earth Industry Association (REIA) and the Critical Minerals Association (CMA).

Jordan Lindsay

Jordan Lindsay

Head of Research & Development

Jordan is Head of Research & Development at Minviro, responsible for all academic and industrial research projects including UK and EU grants and commercial collaborations. He leads projects integrating raw material and battery production LCA databases with Minviro's technology solutions, and investigates decarbonisation technology applications including photovoltaics, hydrogen, and electric motors. Jordan completed his PhD in Geology at the University of Exeter, Camborne School of Mines, where he studied platinum-group metal prospectivity using machine learning approaches.

Robert Pell

Robert Pell

Founder & CEO

Robert Pell is the Founder and CEO of Minviro. His doctoral research at the University of Exeter's Camborne School of Mines focused on responsible sourcing of rare earth elements, pioneering novel Life Cycle Assessment approaches and developing methodology for integrating LCA into mine planning. A published scientist and experienced speaker, Robert holds roles as Chair of the Rare Earth Industry Association (REIA) and the Critical Minerals Association (CMA).

Jordan Lindsay

Jordan Lindsay

Head of Research & Development

Jordan is Head of Research & Development at Minviro, responsible for all academic and industrial research projects including UK and EU grants and commercial collaborations. He leads projects integrating raw material and battery production LCA databases with Minviro's technology solutions, and investigates decarbonisation technology applications including photovoltaics, hydrogen, and electric motors. Jordan completed his PhD in Geology at the University of Exeter, Camborne School of Mines, where he studied platinum-group metal prospectivity using machine learning approaches.

LCA with Minviro

The foundation for
all our work

The foundation for all our work

Our data focuses on materials and processes where environmental performance varies sharply by route, geography, and technology, exactly where industry averages fall apart. Choose individual routes from across the critical minerals, battery, magnet, and heavy-industry value chains. Each one lands in XYCLE as a working model: open the unit processes, see where the impact sits, test a different supplier or energy grid, and watch the number move, defensible enough for a regulatory filing, transparent enough to act on.

read more

300+

projects across leading OEMs and product portfolios

46+

countries and regional data covered through our work

3

global offices in London, Perth and Shanghai