XYCLE INCLUDED IN VERDANTIX SMART INNOVATORS 2025

White staircase in a vibrant field of red poppies.

8

processing routes assessed for cobalt, nickel and lithium

processing routes assessed for cobalt, nickel and lithium

White staircase in a vibrant field of red poppies.

8

processing routes assessed for cobalt, nickel and lithium

Case study

Tesla Impact Report 2021

Tesla Impact Report 2021

At a glance

In a rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, understanding the environmental implications of battery production is paramount. Tesla, a frontrunner in this industry, sought expertise in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to comprehend the global warming potential across their battery supply chain. Minviro, recognized for its deep expertise in LCA, became Tesla's choice for this critical assessment.

In a rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, understanding the environmental implications of battery production is paramount. Tesla, a frontrunner in this industry, sought expertise in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to comprehend the global warming potential across their battery supply chain. Minviro, recognized for its deep expertise in LCA, became Tesla's choice for this critical assessment.

  • Key Challenge

  • Tesla needed to identify global warming potential hotspots across eight processing routes for cobalt, nickel and lithium used in battery production.

  • Solution

  • Minviro assessed cathode and anode supply chains, compared battery compositions and evaluated chemical processing against mining to identify the main greenhouse gas emissions hotspots.

Results

Nickel and lithium were the primary contributors within the cathode supply chain. Cobalt made a comparatively small contribution, while refining and smelting had a greater impact than mining. The findings featured in Tesla’s 2021 Impact Report.

  • Nickel and lithium were the main cathode supply-chain emissions hotspots.

  • Chemical processing, particularly refining and smelting, had a greater impact than mining.

  • The analysis gave Tesla evidence to guide sustainable and secure supply-chain decisions.

Our collaboration

Overview

In a rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, understanding the environmental implications of battery production is paramount. Tesla, a frontrunner in this industry, sought expertise in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to comprehend the global warming potential across their battery supply chain. Minviro, recognized for its deep expertise in LCA, became Tesla's choice for this critical assessment.

Objective

To identify and analyze the significant global warming potential hotspots across eight specific processing routes for sourcing cobalt, nickel, and lithium – three key elements in Tesla's battery production.

Approach

Hotspot Identification: A methodical approach to understanding the GHG emissions from the production of cobalt, nickel, and lithium was initiated.

Deep Dive into Battery Compositions: Recognizing that different battery compositions have unique environmental impacts, an in-depth analysis was undertaken.

Supply Chain Analysis: A holistic assessment of the cathode and anode supply chains, including a focused study on nickel, lithium, and cobalt, was conducted.

Refining vs. Mining: A comparative analysis to understand the GHG emissions from the chemical processing stages versus the mining stages.

Key Findings

Major Hotspots: The study pinpointed nickel and lithium as the primary contributors to GHG emissions within the cathode supply chain.

Cobalt's Minimal Role: Contrary to common beliefs, cobalt emerged as a minimal contributor to GHG emissions.

Chemical Processing Impact: The analysis revealed that the chemical processing stages, especially refining and smelting, had a more pronounced environmental impact than mining.

Impact

Minviro's analysis provided Tesla with actionable insights into their supply chain, empowering them to make informed decisions. The findings underscored the significance of understanding the environmental impacts at each stage of battery production and identified areas for potential improvements.

Recognition

Tesla's 2021 Impact Report prominently featured Minviro's contributions, solidifying our position as a leading expert in LCA and reinforcing our commitment to fostering a sustainable future.

Conclusion

This partnership with Tesla exemplifies Minviro's dedication to advancing environmentally responsible practices within the battery and EV industry. By offering precise insights and recommendations, we are actively shaping the industry's journey towards a more sustainable future. See Tesla's 2021 impact report here

Overview

In a rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, understanding the environmental implications of battery production is paramount. Tesla, a frontrunner in this industry, sought expertise in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to comprehend the global warming potential across their battery supply chain. Minviro, recognized for its deep expertise in LCA, became Tesla's choice for this critical assessment.

Objective

To identify and analyze the significant global warming potential hotspots across eight specific processing routes for sourcing cobalt, nickel, and lithium – three key elements in Tesla's battery production.

Approach

Hotspot Identification: A methodical approach to understanding the GHG emissions from the production of cobalt, nickel, and lithium was initiated.

Deep Dive into Battery Compositions: Recognizing that different battery compositions have unique environmental impacts, an in-depth analysis was undertaken.

Supply Chain Analysis: A holistic assessment of the cathode and anode supply chains, including a focused study on nickel, lithium, and cobalt, was conducted.

Refining vs. Mining: A comparative analysis to understand the GHG emissions from the chemical processing stages versus the mining stages.

Key Findings

Major Hotspots: The study pinpointed nickel and lithium as the primary contributors to GHG emissions within the cathode supply chain.

Cobalt's Minimal Role: Contrary to common beliefs, cobalt emerged as a minimal contributor to GHG emissions.

Chemical Processing Impact: The analysis revealed that the chemical processing stages, especially refining and smelting, had a more pronounced environmental impact than mining.

Impact

Minviro's analysis provided Tesla with actionable insights into their supply chain, empowering them to make informed decisions. The findings underscored the significance of understanding the environmental impacts at each stage of battery production and identified areas for potential improvements.

Recognition

Tesla's 2021 Impact Report prominently featured Minviro's contributions, solidifying our position as a leading expert in LCA and reinforcing our commitment to fostering a sustainable future.

Conclusion

This partnership with Tesla exemplifies Minviro's dedication to advancing environmentally responsible practices within the battery and EV industry. By offering precise insights and recommendations, we are actively shaping the industry's journey towards a more sustainable future. See Tesla's 2021 impact report here

Overview

In a rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, understanding the environmental implications of battery production is paramount. Tesla, a frontrunner in this industry, sought expertise in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to comprehend the global warming potential across their battery supply chain. Minviro, recognized for its deep expertise in LCA, became Tesla's choice for this critical assessment.

Objective

To identify and analyze the significant global warming potential hotspots across eight specific processing routes for sourcing cobalt, nickel, and lithium – three key elements in Tesla's battery production.

Approach

Hotspot Identification: A methodical approach to understanding the GHG emissions from the production of cobalt, nickel, and lithium was initiated.

Deep Dive into Battery Compositions: Recognizing that different battery compositions have unique environmental impacts, an in-depth analysis was undertaken.

Supply Chain Analysis: A holistic assessment of the cathode and anode supply chains, including a focused study on nickel, lithium, and cobalt, was conducted.

Refining vs. Mining: A comparative analysis to understand the GHG emissions from the chemical processing stages versus the mining stages.

Key Findings

Major Hotspots: The study pinpointed nickel and lithium as the primary contributors to GHG emissions within the cathode supply chain.

Cobalt's Minimal Role: Contrary to common beliefs, cobalt emerged as a minimal contributor to GHG emissions.

Chemical Processing Impact: The analysis revealed that the chemical processing stages, especially refining and smelting, had a more pronounced environmental impact than mining.

Impact

Minviro's analysis provided Tesla with actionable insights into their supply chain, empowering them to make informed decisions. The findings underscored the significance of understanding the environmental impacts at each stage of battery production and identified areas for potential improvements.

Recognition

Tesla's 2021 Impact Report prominently featured Minviro's contributions, solidifying our position as a leading expert in LCA and reinforcing our commitment to fostering a sustainable future.

Conclusion

This partnership with Tesla exemplifies Minviro's dedication to advancing environmentally responsible practices within the battery and EV industry. By offering precise insights and recommendations, we are actively shaping the industry's journey towards a more sustainable future. See Tesla's 2021 impact report here

A single tree on a vibrant green rolling hill.
A single tree on a vibrant green rolling hill.

Customers

Don't miss these

authors

The team behind your insights

FAQ

Curious to learn more?

Let us support you on the journey.

Let us support you on the journey.

What challenge did Tesla need to address?

Tesla needed to identify global warming potential hotspots across eight processing routes for cobalt, nickel and lithium used in battery production.

How did Minviro support the project?

Minviro assessed cathode and anode supply chains, compared battery compositions and evaluated chemical processing against mining to identify the main greenhouse gas emissions hotspots.

What were the findings or intended benefits?

Nickel and lithium were the primary contributors within the cathode supply chain. Cobalt made a comparatively small contribution, while refining and smelting had a greater impact than mining. The findings featured in Tesla’s 2021 Impact Report.

What challenge did Tesla need to address?

Tesla needed to identify global warming potential hotspots across eight processing routes for cobalt, nickel and lithium used in battery production.

How did Minviro support the project?

Minviro assessed cathode and anode supply chains, compared battery compositions and evaluated chemical processing against mining to identify the main greenhouse gas emissions hotspots.

What were the findings or intended benefits?

Nickel and lithium were the primary contributors within the cathode supply chain. Cobalt made a comparatively small contribution, while refining and smelting had a greater impact than mining. The findings featured in Tesla’s 2021 Impact Report.